Best AI Agent Development Service Providers

Deviniti vs LeewayHertz: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: August 2026

Quick verdict

Deviniti (3.8/5) edges ahead of LeewayHertz (3.6/5) overall. Deviniti is the better choice for buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. LeewayHertz is the stronger option for buyers who specifically want post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network alongside agent development.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Deviniti vs LeewayHertz: head-to-head summary

Criterion Deviniti LeewayHertz
Founded 2004 2007
HQ Wrocław, Poland Gurugram, India
Team size 201–500 51–300
Rating 3.8 / 5 3.6 / 5
Best for Buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record. Buyers who specifically want post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network alongside agent development.
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Python, Java, LangChain Python, LangChain, LangGraph
Industries served Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS

Deviniti vs LeewayHertz: overview

Deviniti

Deviniti is a Wrocław, Poland-based software company founded in 2004 by Piotr Dorosz and Jacek Machata, with roughly 260 employees across Europe and North America. Its established Atlassian Marketplace app and consulting business gives procurement teams a checkable, independently reviewable track record (via Atlassian's own partner and marketplace listings) beyond the vendor's self-reported claims — a useful reference point that most competitors on this list lack. Agentic AI is a newer addition to that enterprise systems-integration practice, so buyers should weight recent agent-specific references over the firm's overall two-decade tenure.

LeewayHertz

LeewayHertz is an AI development company founded in 2007, with LinkedIn listing its headquarters in Gurugram, Haryana, India and other sources noting a San Francisco corporate office; reported headcount ranges from roughly 180 to 300 employees. The firm was acquired by The Hackett Group on September 16, 2024 — procurement teams drafting a contract should include a change-of-control or vendor-continuity clause given this recent ownership transition, and should verify current entity name and signing authority directly. Post-acquisition, buyers gain nominal access to Hackett Group's broader enterprise consulting network, though the practical integration of that access should be confirmed rather than assumed.

Services and capabilities: Deviniti vs LeewayHertz

Capability Deviniti LeewayHertz
Multi-agent orchestration
RAG / knowledge integration
Workflow & systems integration
Coding agents
Monitoring & anomaly detection
Customer-facing agents

Tech stack comparison: Deviniti vs LeewayHertz

Framework / platform Deviniti LeewayHertz
LangChain
LangGraph N/A
AutoGen N/A N/A
LlamaIndex N/A N/A
OpenAI N/A N/A
Anthropic Claude N/A N/A
Pinecone N/A N/A
AWS
Azure
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Deviniti vs LeewayHertz

Criterion Deviniti LeewayHertz
Minimum engagement $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: Deviniti vs LeewayHertz

Dimension Deviniti LeewayHertz
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce
Best use cases Buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace, Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract Multi-agent architecture procurement for data-rich enterprise environments, Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP)
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Deviniti vs LeewayHertz: pros and cons

Deviniti
+ Atlassian Marketplace and partner listings give procurement an independently checkable track record
+ Two decades of enterprise systems-integration experience, originally rooted in financial-sector IT
+ ~260-person team spread across Europe and North America for regional delivery coverage
+ Founder-led continuity since 2004 provides institutional stability through a long contract lifecycle
- Agentic AI is a newer addition to a legacy enterprise-software and Atlassian practice, with a shorter track record
- Less name recognition in AI-specific procurement circles compared to AI-first competitors
- Public agent-specific case studies are limited relative to its Atlassian portfolio
LeewayHertz
+ Nearly two decades of AI development history since 2007
+ Deep experience with multi-agent orchestration framework selection for complex environments
+ Strong ERP/CRM integration experience for enterprise data-rich deployments
+ Post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's broader enterprise consulting network
- Acquired by The Hackett Group in September 2024 — procurement contracts should include a change-of-control clause given the recent transition
- Reported headquarters and headcount vary noticeably across sources, worth confirming directly post-acquisition
- Heavy content-marketing presence means its public profile can outpace independently verified differentiation versus peers of similar size

Who should choose Deviniti?

Deviniti is the right choice for buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..

An Atlassian Marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, applied to agent workflow integration.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.

Who should choose LeewayHertz?

LeewayHertz is the right choice for buyers who specifically want post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network alongside agent development..

Deep multi-agent orchestration and ERP/CRM integration experience, now paired with The Hackett Group's consulting network post-acquisition.. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS.

Decision matrix: Deviniti vs LeewayHertz

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Deviniti
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Deviniti
Your budget is at the lower end Deviniti
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Deviniti
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Deviniti vs LeewayHertz

Use case Deviniti fit LeewayHertz fit Winner
Buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace Strong Strong Both equally
Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract Strong Limited Deviniti
Multi-agent architecture procurement for data-rich enterprise environments Limited Strong LeewayHertz
Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP) Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Deviniti vs LeewayHertz

Deviniti (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. An Atlassian Marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, applied to agent workflow integration.. It is best for buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..

LeewayHertz (3.6/5) is the better choice when buyers who specifically want post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network alongside agent development.. If your situation matches those criteria, LeewayHertz is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Deviniti vs LeewayHertz FAQ

Is Deviniti better than LeewayHertz?

Deviniti (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Deviniti is better for buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. LeewayHertz is better for buyers who specifically want post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network alongside agent development..

How do Deviniti and LeewayHertz differ in pricing?

Deviniti uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). LeewayHertz uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Deviniti or LeewayHertz?

Deviniti is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each provider before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Deviniti and LeewayHertz?

Deviniti's primary differentiator is: an atlassian marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, applied to agent workflow integration.. LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: deep multi-agent orchestration and erp/crm integration experience, now paired with the hackett group's consulting network post-acquisition.. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 51–300), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Manufacturing vs Financial Services, Manufacturing).

Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each provider before making a decision.